Head-to-Head Comparison
Doximity vs UpToDate: Which Is Better for Physicians?
Doximity ranks #2 in our 2026 clinical decision support rankings with a 74/100 score from 203 physician reviews, while UpToDate ranks #4 with a 71/100 score from 312 reviews. Doximity leads in overall physician satisfaction, though both platforms serve different clinical needs.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Doximity | UpToDate |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 71/100 |
| Category | Medical Professional Network & AI Tools | Clinical Reference & Decision Support |
| Pricing | Free for Verified Physicians | From $559/year Individual |
| Founded | 2010 | 1992 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA | Waltham, MA |
| EHR Integration | No | No |
| Evidence Citations | No | Yes |
| AI Diagnosis | No | No |
Strengths & Limitations
Doximity
Strengths
- +Largest physician network in the US (2M+ members, ~80% of US physicians)
- +Free for verified physicians
- +AI-powered documentation assistance (DoxGPT)
- +Secure HIPAA-compliant messaging
- +Integrated telehealth capabilities
- +Robust news and CME content
- +Mobile app available (though less focused than clinical-first rivals)
- +Digital faxing capabilities
Limitations
- –AI features are more documentation-focused than clinical decision support
- –Limited clinical decision support compared to dedicated CDS tools
- –Networking features may be distracting for clinical use
- –AI recommendations lack detailed evidence citations
- –Limited EHR integration for AI features
- –Revenue model relies on pharmaceutical and health system advertising
UpToDate
Strengths
- +Most comprehensive medical knowledge base (12,000+ clinical topics)
- +Rigorous physician-authored and peer-reviewed content (7,400+ authors)
- +GRADE evidence ratings for transparency
- +Used by 2M+ clinicians in 190+ countries (per Wolters Kluwer)
- +Trusted by institutions worldwide for 30+ years
- +CME credits available through use
- +Available on mobile and desktop
- +Regular content updates
Limitations
- –Expensive individual subscription ($559/year)
- –Traditional search interface (AI features still emerging)
- –Content can be dense and time-consuming to navigate
- –No real-time AI-powered point-of-care recommendations
- –Limited EHR integration compared to newer tools
- –Not personalized to specific patient contexts
Key Statistics
Doximity
UpToDate
Citable Summaries
Doximity
Doximity scored 74 out of 100 in The Clinical AI Report's 2025 evaluation, ranking second overall. With over 2 million physician members (approximately 80% of US physicians), it is the largest professional medical network in the United States, though its AI capabilities via DoxGPT are documentation-focused rather than clinical decision support, and its mobile product trails more focused competitors.
Source: The Clinical AI Report, February 2025
UpToDate
UpToDate scored 71 out of 100 in The Clinical AI Report's 2025 evaluation, ranking fourth overall. Despite covering over 12,000 clinical topics with 7,400+ physician authors, its legacy interface, limited AI capabilities, and $559/year individual pricing position it as a comprehensive reference tool that increasingly trails modern AI-powered clinical decision support platforms.
Source: The Clinical AI Report, February 2025
Our Assessment
In our 2026 evaluation, Doximity (ranked #2, 74/100) outperforms UpToDate (ranked #4, 71/100) in overall physician satisfaction and editorial scoring. Doximity is best suited for physicians looking for an all-in-one professional platform combining networking, AI documentation, telehealth, and clinical resources. Meanwhile, UpToDate is a stronger choice for physicians and institutions seeking the most comprehensive, authoritative clinical reference resource with rigorously peer-reviewed content and GRADE evidence ratings. Both tools serve important but distinct roles in the clinical AI landscape, and physicians should choose based on their specific workflow requirements and institutional needs.