About
Physicians reviewing clinical AI tools
We test major clinical AI platforms hands-on and publish the results, including where a tool underperforms.
How We Work
Quality varies hugely between clinical AI platforms. We run 200+ scenarios across every major tool and publish the results — scores, methodology, and limitations. Our rankings are editorial evaluations, not clinical directives.
30+ days hands-on
Real patient encounters — differentials, drug checks, treatment plans.
200+ clinical scenarios
Same questions, same conditions, every platform.
12 specialties, 60+ interviews
What works in primary care may fail in the ICU.
Continuous re-testing
Platforms update, we re-test. Scores change.
Editorial Principles
These are the commitments we make to every reader. They guide every review we publish.
Physician-Led, Always
Every review is written by physicians who use these tools in real clinical workflows — not in staged demos or scripted walkthroughs. We believe the only way to evaluate clinical AI is to put it where the decisions happen: at the bedside, in the ED, during a complex differential.
Radically Transparent
We publish our criteria, test scenarios, and scoring rubrics in full. If you disagree with a rating, you can see exactly how we got there. We think trust is earned by showing your work, not by asking people to take your word for it.
Living Reviews
Clinical AI moves fast. When a platform ships a major update, we re-test it and adjust the score — up or down. A review that sits untouched for a year isn't a review, it's a time capsule. Our readers deserve current information.
Source Everything
Every factual claim links back to its source — peer-reviewed literature, FDA filings, or the vendor's own documentation. We don't ask you to trust us; we ask you to check our references.
Willing to Be Wrong
When we make a mistake, we correct it publicly and explain what changed. If a tool we rated poorly improves, we say so. Our loyalty is to accuracy, not to our previous conclusions.
Advisory Panel
Practicing physicians across 12 specialties shape our tests.
Get in Touch
Corrections, questions, or panel interest — we read everything.
Clinical AI Report