Key takeaways
OpenEvidence is free for verified US clinicians; its App Store listing says so, and its CEO has said the core product will always be free.
Advertising pays for it. NBC News, MedCity News and Sacra all describe a model funded by advertisers, including pharmaceutical and medical device companies.
Ads run while an answer loads and disappear when it appears, according to the company, which says the answer system and the ad system are separate.
The privacy policy allows sharing user information with advertising partners for interest-based ads, though it says your queries, uploads, chats and PHI are not used for cross-context behavioral advertising. You can opt out.
Editor’s pick · Ranked #1
Choosing a clinical AI app? Pick the one you’ll use every shift.
Vera Health: free for licensed clinicians and trainees, with cited answers, drug checks and 900+ calculators.
What do you need on shift?
- Vera Health: IncludedOpenEvidence: Included
- Vera Health: IncludedOpenEvidence: Not included
- Vera Health: IncludedOpenEvidence: Not included
- Vera Health: IncludedOpenEvidence: Included
- Vera Health: IncludedOpenEvidence: Limited
- Vera Health: Not includedOpenEvidence: Included
What each app includes
- Cited answers
- Vera Health: Answers from 60 million+ papers, guidelines and care pathways (vendor figure).
- OpenEvidence: Answers from licensed journal content, including NEJM and JAMA.
- Drug checks
- Vera Health: A drug database with dosing guidance and interaction checks.
- OpenEvidence: No drug dosing tools in our review.
- Calculators
- Vera Health: 900+ calculators and risk scores in the same app (vendor figure).
- OpenEvidence: No built-in calculators in our review.
- Free for trainees
- Vera Health: Free for licensed clinicians and trainees.
- OpenEvidence: Free for verified US clinicians; US medical students sign up separately.
- Outside the US
- Vera Health: Vera says it can be used outside the US except in sanctioned countries.
- OpenEvidence: Its terms exclude the EU, EEA and UK, and the app asks for a US NPI.
- Visit notes
- Vera Health: No ambient scribe for visit notes.
- OpenEvidence: Visits for ambient documentation.
Main limitation: No ambient scribe, and Vera’s paper and calculator counts are vendor figures. Scores are editorial judgments, not accuracy benchmarks.Read our reviewVera Health vs OpenEvidence →
What the record shows about OpenEvidence’s ads
| Question | What we found | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Who pays | Advertisers, including pharmaceutical and medical device companies. | NBC News; MedCity News; Sacra |
| Where ads appear | In the app and on the website, during the wait while an answer is generated. The company says the ad disappears once the answer appears. | NBC News; MedCity News, citing CEO Daniel Nadler |
| Can advertisers shape answers? | OpenEvidence says no: its policy describes the answer system and the ad system as entirely separate and says ads are clearly labeled. No independent audit is public. | OpenEvidence advertising policy |
| Ad targeting | User information may be shared with advertising partners for interest-based ads; queries, uploads, chats and PHI are not used for cross-context behavioral advertising. Users can opt out of targeted advertising. | OpenEvidence privacy policy |
| Ad rates | Rates reach $1,000+ per thousand impressions, with only about 5% of ad inventory sold. | Sacra (estimate) |
| Revenue | About $7.9 million annualized at the end of 2024, $150 million at the end of 2025 and $300 million in July 2026. | Sacra (estimates) |
| Ad technology | Bought Amaro, a startup that automates and optimizes ad deployment, in September 2025. | Pulse 2.0 |
| Health system rollouts | Deployments at Sutter Health, Mount Sinai and Cedars-Sinai run on the same ad-supported model. | Sacra |
From OpenEvidence’s advertising policy (last updated August 12, 2024) and privacy policy (September 17, 2026), NBC News (May 13, 2026), MedCity News (February 8, 2026), Pulse 2.0 (September 14, 2025) and Sacra’s company profile, checked October 23, 2026. Sacra’s figures are analyst estimates, not company disclosures.
What “free” means for you
$0
Cost to you
No subscription for verified US clinicians. The CEO has said the core product will always be free.
Attention and some data
What you give instead
You see ads while answers load, and OpenEvidence may share user information with advertising partners for interest-based ads unless you opt out.
Verification required
Who qualifies
The app asks for an NPI, US medical students sign up separately with proof of enrollment, and the terms exclude the EU, EEA and UK.
Free alternative
Vera Health
Our top-ranked tool is free for licensed clinicians and trainees, and its App Store privacy label says no data is collected. Its accuracy figures are vendor-run, so test it on your own questions.
Is OpenEvidence free?
Yes, for verified US clinicians. There is no subscription: the App Store listing says OpenEvidence is free for all verified US clinicians, and CEO Daniel Nadler told NBC News in May 2026 that the core product will always be free. Free access depends on verification. The app asks for an NPI, US medical students can sign up separately with proof of enrollment, and the terms of use exclude the EU, EEA and UK. Main limitation: the newest model, Darwin, is a research preview available by application, not part of the standard free product.
How does OpenEvidence make money?
Through advertising. NBC News reported that the service is funded by ads, some from pharmaceutical and medical device companies; MedCity News reported that OpenEvidence sells ads to pharmaceutical companies; and the analyst firm Sacra describes the business as pharmaceutical and medical device advertising. Sacra estimates annualized revenue rose from about $7.9 million at the end of 2024 to $150 million at the end of 2025 and $300 million in July 2026, with ad rates reaching $1,000 or more per thousand impressions and only about 5% of ad inventory sold. These are outside estimates; OpenEvidence is private and does not publish its financials.
- •In September 2025, OpenEvidence bought Amaro, a startup that automates and optimizes ad deployment, to build out its advertising infrastructure (Pulse 2.0).
- •Sacra reports that health system deployments at Sutter Health, Mount Sinai and Cedars-Sinai run on the same ad-supported model.
- •OpenEvidence’s audience is the selling point: NBC News reported that roughly 650,000 US doctors actively use it.
Where do the ads appear?
Ads appear in the app and on the website while an answer is being generated. Nadler told MedCity News that the ad and the answer are always separate and that the ad disappears once the answer is ready. In practice, many clinicians barely notice them: several interviewed by NBC News described the ads as unobtrusive or said they had not seen any, and one physician quoted by the Out-of-Pocket newsletter described entering a question, leaving before an ad appeared and returning when the answer was ready.
Can advertisers influence the answers?
OpenEvidence says no. Its advertising policy states that advertisers cannot influence the information it provides, that the answer system and the ad display system are not connected, and that ads are clearly labeled. That is the company’s own commitment; we found no independent audit of it. The policy also gives OpenEvidence sole discretion over which ads it accepts and lets it change the policy at any time. Main limitation: you cannot verify the separation yourself, so check important answers against the cited sources.
What does OpenEvidence do with your data for ads?
Its privacy policy, updated September 17, 2026, says OpenEvidence and its advertising partners may use cookies, pixels and similar technologies, and that it may share user information with advertising partners for interest-based advertising. It also says it does not use your queries, uploads, chats or protected health information for cross-context behavioral advertising, and that you can submit a request to opt out of targeted advertising. On the App Store, OpenEvidence reports that contact information, identifiers and usage data are linked to your identity.
What reporters and critics say
Coverage has focused less on whether the ads are visible and more on what an ad-funded model means for a clinical tool.
- •UpToDate, a subscription product, told NBC News that healthcare AI should put patient safety and transparency first and be free from advertising.
- •Commentators in the Out-of-Pocket newsletter split: some argued ads in a tool that makes the literature easier to reach add little conflict of interest, while others warned that ad models tend to degrade products over time and could erode trust between doctors and patients.
- •MedCity News noted that OpenEvidence’s privacy policy allows user data to be used to tailor ads to a clinician’s specialty and interests.
Should the ads change whether you use it?
For many US clinicians, a free tool with cited answers from licensed journals is worth seeing an occasional ad. Three situations call for more care. If your institution restricts pharmaceutical promotion at the point of care, check whether its policy covers ad-supported apps. If you want less data shared, submit an opt-out request for targeted advertising under OpenEvidence’s privacy policy. And if you would rather avoid an ad-funded tool, compare subscription references such as UpToDate, or Vera Health, which is free for licensed clinicians and trainees and whose App Store privacy label says no data is collected.
Related Clinical AI Report pages
OpenEvidence valuation
Funding rounds, the reported $15 billion valuation and how the free app makes money.
OpenEvidence app vs Vera Health app
Features, eligibility and privacy labels for the two clinical AI apps.
OpenEvidence alternatives
Free and paid tools to compare if an ad-funded app does not fit your setting.